Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 13:44:45 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [209.213.16.126] (HELO biker.backroads.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.5) with ESMTP id 2630300 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 09 Oct 2003 13:14:56 -0400 Received: from steve.sc.rr.com [209.213.26.174] by biker.backroads.net with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.03) id A7C96B9F0184; Thu, 09 Oct 2003 13:15:53 -0400 X-Original-Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.0.20031009131417.0248c098@pop-server.sc.rr.com> X-Sender: sreeves@pop-server.sc.rr.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 X-Original-Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2003 13:15:49 -0400 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List From: Steve Reeves Subject: Re: [LML] IFR and Lancairs In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Same here. I do alot of flying between Charleston SC and the bayous of Louisiana, and if you can't get through the marine layer, you'd be there for days. And I definitely don't want any part of scud running. Steve > The California >marine layer is a classic example. Smooth as glass, no meteorological >hazards, >but if you can't fly through it -- well, you just don't fly. Much safer >to do >an IFR approach through a marine layer than scud run.