Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 17:12:16 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-d03.mx.aol.com ([205.188.157.35] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.3) with ESMTP id 2584723 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 16:10:09 -0400 Received: from JIMRHER@aol.com by imo-d03.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v36_r1.1.) id q.144.1926f88a (4254) for ; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 16:09:45 -0400 (EDT) From: JIMRHER@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <144.1926f88a.2c9b6b09@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 16:09:45 EDT Subject: Lancair Builders List Update X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_144.1926f88a.2c9b6b09_boundary" X-Mailer: 8.0 for Windows sub 910 --part1_144.1926f88a.2c9b6b09_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I was just looking at the Builders List for some folks that I have met at flyins and I see that the Builders List is very out-of-date. Most haven't updated there information for years. Is there a reason? Or doesn't anyone use this list? Why don't many folks on this email list even fill out the Builders Listing? Just Lurking, Jim Hergert N6XE, "An Sex Y" L4P --part1_144.1926f88a.2c9b6b09_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I was just looking at the Builders Li= st for some folks that I have met at flyins and I see that the Builders List= is very out-of-date. Most haven't updated there information for years. Is t= here a reason? Or doesn't anyone use this list? Why don't many folks on this= email list even fill out the Builders Listing?

Just Lurking,

Jim Hergert
N6XE, "An Sex Y" L4P
 --part1_144.1926f88a.2c9b6b09_boundary--