Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 16:51:51 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-m05.mx.aol.com ([64.12.136.8] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.3) with ESMTP id 2579196 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 14 Sep 2003 14:33:21 -0400 Received: from Sky2high@aol.com by imo-m05.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v36_r1.1.) id q.d.1889d52b (3850) for ; Sun, 14 Sep 2003 14:33:18 -0400 (EDT) From: Sky2high@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 14:33:18 EDT Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Gross Weight & Balance of IV-P, Other considerations for Lancairs X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1063564398" X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 1060 -------------------------------1063564398 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 9/14/2003 1:07:55 PM Central Daylight Time, marv@lancaironline.net writes: The essential question is this. Do we play conservative by keeping the higher margins, or are we comfortable with the margins that the FAA has used for eons? Are we confident that our wing is as strong as the Lancair test wing? Ted, Hey, It's experimental. Each makes his own choice. <<>> My heavy airplane was more responsive in pitch with the heavy load and with the CG, although within range, moved towards the rear. Just a gentle oscillation until the weight was reduced. The autopilot just couldn't find where to set the elevator. Scott Krueger Sky2high@aol.com II-P N92EX IO320 Aurora, IL (KARR) -------------------------------1063564398 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In a message dated 9/14/2003 1:07:55 PM Central Daylight Time, marv@lan= caironline.net writes:
The essential question is this. Do we play con= servative by keeping the higher
margins, or are we comfortable with the=20= margins that the FAA has used for
eons? Are we confident that our wing i= s as strong as the Lancair test wing?
Ted,
 
Hey, It's experimental.  Each makes his own choice.
 
<<<BTW, heavy airplanes are less responsive to control inputs.= Could that explain
the autopilot symptoms you report?>>>
 
My heavy airplane was more responsive in pitch with the heavy load and=20= with the CG, although within range, moved towards the rear.  Just=20= a gentle oscillation until the weight was reduced.  The autopilot just=20= couldn't find where to set the elevator.
 
Scott Krueger
Sky2high@aol.com
II-P N92EX IO320 Aurora, IL (KARR)
-------------------------------1063564398--