Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net> (Marvin Kaye)
To: lml
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 12:13:09 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-2578248@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <artbertolina@earthlink.net>
Received: from conure.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.54] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.3)
  with ESMTP id 2578186 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 13 Sep 2003 11:02:12 -0400
Received: from 66-215-178-117.rc-eres.charterpipeline.net ([66.215.178.117] helo=artlt)
	by conure.mail.pas.earthlink.net with smtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
	id 19yBuc-0003k8-00
	for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 13 Sep 2003 08:02:11 -0700
X-Original-Message-ID: <001801c37a07$6864c4a0$4400000a@tstonramp.com>
From: "Art/Sue Bertolina" <artbertolina@earthlink.net>
X-Original-To: "Lancair list Lancair list" <lml@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Turbulator Tape vs Vortex Generators
X-Original-Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 07:57:52 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600

sounds like Turbulator Tape and Vortex Generators do
the same job, can they be used interchangeable?, is one
more effective or preferable over the other?. Has anyone
in the Lancair Community had experience with either or
maybe both and can give us a comparison
Art