Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 19:38:05 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from gateway.wvi.com ([204.119.27.10] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.3) with ESMTP id 2577568 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 18:22:50 -0400 Received: from dpske.wvi.com (unknown [204.119.61.51]) by gateway.wvi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ECFC10E39 for ; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 15:19:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20030912151325.00a2b2f0@gateway.wvi.com> X-Sender: dpske@gateway.wvi.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 X-Original-Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 15:20:52 -0700 X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" From: Don Skeele Subject: Re: [LML] Re: LNC2: sagging motor mounts In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Scott, Regardless of the bolt size, it is "rubber" mount you are torquing, not the bolt, whether Lords or others. Check with the mfgr and you might be surprised at the recommended value, although I don't believe 15 INCH POUNDS is critical, it certainly ain't FOOT lbs... Regards.. Don Skeele At 12:59 PM 9/12/03 -0400, you wrote: >In a message dated 9/12/2003 9:24:23 AM Central Daylight Time, >marv@lancaironline.net writes: >When all >is done, retorque to 15 INCH-POUNDS. The normal engine mount........ > >Don, et al, > >Yikes! If I remember correctly, these are AN bolts 7/16-20 that have a >torque range of at least 38-42 FOOT POUNDS. If they are 1/2-20 the range >is 40-57.5 FOOT POUNDS. > >Check the bolt size and an appropriate torque chart when these are >tightened down. > >Scott Krueger >Sky2high@aol.com >II-P N92EX IO320 Aurora, IL (KARR) > >PS: the best washers are those cut off of the old mounts - just the right >diameter.