Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2003 11:58:58 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from remt26.cluster1.charter.net ([209.225.8.36] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.1) with ESMTP id 2544265 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 24 Aug 2003 11:03:46 -0400 Received: from [24.217.123.11] (HELO computer) by remt26.cluster1.charter.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.6) with SMTP id 129991500 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 24 Aug 2003 11:03:13 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <003a01c36a51$16a652c0$0b7bd918@computer> From: "Bob Jude" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Antenna Measurements X-Original-Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2003 10:04:58 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Charles Patton, Congratulations on keeping us straight thinking about antenna measurements. On this forum, when some one makes statements clearly outside their area of expertise, it is good to hear from some one that really knows the subject. Bob Jude N65BJ > Brent, I'm sorry, but you have to be careful about making this statement. The only thing that a low VSWR guarantees is maximum power transfer from the source if it's impedance is that of the VSWR measuring device. It absolutely does not guarantee radiation efficiency. It is that in most circumstances with similar style antennas, the radiation efficiency of the antenna is similar, therefore more power in is more power radiated. Without doing antenna range type measurements, I am concerned with using carbon fiber as your ground plane. There is the real possibility that you can get a match to the cable, and dissipate a significant amount of RF in the resistive carbon. You could have good VSWR, but lowered radiation efficiency. This would also translate to a lower receiving antenna efficiency too. Charles R. Patton LNC2 360JM