Return-Path: Received: from [65.33.166.39] (account ) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.1.1) with HTTP id 2535581 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 20 Aug 2003 21:32:01 -0400 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: [LML] Re: MoGas and altitude To: lml X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.1.1 Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 21:32:01 -0400 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <063c01c3677a$96e0c5d0$f004fea9@new> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for "Cy Galley" : Sorry to burst your bubble. 100/130 avgas hasn't been produced for many years. What we have now is car gas juiced up with TEL and other octane enhancers to yield 100 octane. I repeat No 100/130 anymore as the airlines and military have gone to mostly turbine or jet. The few converted civilian planes that need gas are happy with the 100LL. Cy Galley, TC - Chair, Emergency Aircraft Repair, Oshkosh Editor, EAA Safety Programs cgalley@qcbc.org or experimenter@eaa.org Always looking for articles for the Experimenter > I would probably still burn aviation grade 100/130 or 100/130LL.