Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 09:39:25 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-m01.mx.aol.com ([64.12.136.4] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1b9) with ESMTP id 2478645 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 18 Jul 2003 09:00:05 -0400 Received: from VTAILJEFF@aol.com by imo-m01.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v36_r1.1.) id q.25.3be29080 (4328) for ; Fri, 18 Jul 2003 09:00:04 -0400 (EDT) From: VTAILJEFF@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <25.3be29080.2c494952@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 09:00:02 EDT Subject: Re: [LML] Essential Buss versus Fuel Endurance X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 113 SNIP>>For those that felt I was off in left field when I said I felt we should design our electrical systems to outlast our fuel endurance with alternator out, here is a direct quote from BobN about this very subject:>> SNIP I am also reminded of a quote regarding a subject very similar to this one: Clint Eastwood in "Dirty Harry"-- "Do you feel lucky, punk?" Jeff Edwards LIVP N619SJ