Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com

          <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
          <<  Lancair Builders' Mail List  >>
          <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>
My brother is a environmental chemist for Boeing.  He says that MEK is
better for what we are doing and that MC is an environmental substitute
that produces less smog.  As I recall California outlawed MEK so Douglas
had to go to the next best pollution friendly solvent MC.  Boeing in SEA
was still using MEK.  Unless you need to disolve plastic, stick with MEK I
was told.

We are selling an AOA that includes a gear warner.  See
www.angle-of-attack.com if interested.

I too am interested in the main gear struts.  I would like to comment that
if the main gear strut were to compress the prop clearance would increase
not decrease as someone suggested.

Jim Frantz
Lancair Network News