Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 10:08:29 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-m03.mx.aol.com ([64.12.136.6] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.5) with ESMTP id 1992472 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 19 Jan 2003 00:41:26 -0500 Received: from RWolf99@aol.com by imo-m03.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.13.) id q.21.2a605cfe (4230) for ; Sun, 19 Jan 2003 00:41:21 -0500 (EST) From: RWolf99@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <21.2a605cfe.2b5b9481@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 00:41:21 EST Subject: LNC2 Tail Flutter X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 5.0 for Windows sub 108 I understand that there's a difference of opinion between Martin Hollman and the Lancair folks. Hollman's analysis shows a flutter mode well below Vne and Lancair's doesn't. Who knows who is right? I certainly don't. However... I believe that when there is a conflict between test data and analysis results, the hardware probably isn't lying. So the flutter mode that Hollman MEASURED by a ground vibration test on Dave Morss airplane suggests that maybe Martin is on to something. Having said that, the flight history (no known flutter in a gazillion flight hours and no unexplained bits of Lancairs falling out of the sky) tells us that if the flutter mode is real, it must take some amazing stimulus to make it happen. And it must piss off Lancair enormously to have this cloud of suspicion promulgated when there's no evidence of in-flight problems related to this. But I'm a very cautious person -- sometimes too much. And I know just enough engineering to be concerned about this, and without access to the analyses or expertise in flutter, what was I to do? I implemented a variation of Martin's recommendation. I condensed the three fairly wide bids that Hollman suggested into a three-inch wide strip of something like 14 bid, and put it inside the tailcone in the channels formed where the right-left halves glue together. Top and bottom. Thought it was a small price to pay to not have to worry about it anymore. I asked Martin about this and he said something like "That's interesting. It should work, but I can't give you a formal recommendation unless I analyze that, and that will cost you $xxx" where $xxx was something I couldn't possibly afford. If you haven't done one of the modifications (mine or his), I wouldn't lose any sleep until you hear of the first LNC2 Mk II that either flutters below Vne or falls out of the sky for unexplained reasons. Hasn't happened yet and probably won't. That's what I did. If you don't do it to *your* 360 Mk II, I will not hesitate to fly in it. In fact, if anyone wants to offer a ride in an unmodified large tail 360, you know where to find me! - Rob Wolf LNC2 Mk II 51%