Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net> (Marvin Kaye)
To: lml
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 11:34:53 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-1991267@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <rsmiley@centurytel.net>
Received: from mailnw.centurytel.net ([209.206.160.237] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.5)
  with ESMTP id 1991252 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 11:24:46 -0500
Received: from c656256a (pppoe2498.gh.centurytel.net [64.91.55.253])
	by mailnw.centurytel.net (8.12.7/8.12.7) with SMTP id h0HGOj4e023900
	for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Fri, 17 Jan 2003 08:24:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-Message-ID: <000901c2be3c$9ddb37e0$0100a8c0@mshome.net>
From: "Robert Smiley" <rsmiley@centurytel.net>
X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
References: <list-1991220@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [LML] lml   LNC2  Tail Flutter?
X-Original-Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2003 08:25:06 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400

According to "the Don" Geotz, I was told that there was some kind of tiff
between Martin Hollman and Lancair re this subject and not to worry.  Since
I am a third party this information is heresay but I did not do a Finite
Element Analysis and vibration testing of N94RJ.  Does anybody have any
other information, factual or antedodal?

The final proof of this assertion is someone losing their tail!!!
Literally!!!!  Might be mine.

Bob Smiley
N94RJ