Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net> (Marvin Kaye)
To: lml
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 16:00:01 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-1990646@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <rlg34@attbi.com>
Received: from sccrmhc02.attbi.com ([204.127.202.62] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.5)
  with ESMTP id 1990641 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 15:59:35 -0500
Received: from primary (12-234-209-102.client.attbi.com[12.234.209.102])
          by sccrmhc02.attbi.com (sccrmhc02) with SMTP
          id <2003011620593300200mjgh2e>; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 20:59:34 +0000
X-Original-Message-ID: <002001c2bda2$5b2fb500$66d1ea0c@attbi.com>
From: "Larry Graves" <rlg34@attbi.com>
X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
References: <list-1990457@logan.com>
Subject: Re: Wing Loading mysteries
X-Original-Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 13:00:49 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106

> However, it seems to me that if you "put sandbags in the tailcone", you're
> adding to the tail load, not reducing it. What am I missing?

Remember that the tail load is downward. The "sandbags in the tailcone" push
the tail down so that the tail (stab/elevator) doesn't have to, thus
unloading the tail...

Best,

Larry Graves