Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net> (Marvin Kaye)
To: lml
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 16:47:02 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-1942648@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <Adam@ValidationPartners.com>
Received: from mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net ([167.206.5.5] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.3)
  with ESMTP id 1942510 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 13:03:44 -0500
Received: from asv7.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (asv7.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.5.43])
 by mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net
 (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.05 (built Nov  6 2002))
 with ESMTP id <0H7Z00GTKWU3WP@mta2.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for
 lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 13:03:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mta7.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta7.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.5.22])
	by asv7.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (8.12.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id gBVI3Y4g029481	for
 <lml@lancaironline.net>; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 13:03:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ValidationPartners.com
 (ool-18ba44db.dyn.optonline.net [24.186.68.219]) by mta7.srv.hcvlny.cv.net
 (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.05 (built Nov  6 2002))
 with ESMTP id <0H7Z00G73WU93U@mta7.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for
 lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 13:03:50 -0500 (EST)
X-Original-Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 13:04:38 -0500
From: Adam Molny <Adam@ValidationPartners.com>
Subject: Legacy defroster performance
X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List <lml@lancaironline.net>
X-Original-Message-id: <3E11DC36.2BA68184@ValidationPartners.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en-gb] (Win98; U)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
X-Accept-Language: en
References: <list-1942275@logan.com>

Now that there are several Legacys flying, can any of you comment on how
well the defroster works? If you had to do it over, would you change
anything from Lancair's suggested design?

Thanks,
Adam Molny
Legacy #151