Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 16:47:02 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from pintail.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.122] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.3) with ESMTP id 1942534 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 13:53:02 -0500 Received: from sdn-ap-002watacop0272.dialsprint.net ([63.187.201.18] helo=f3g6s4) by pintail.mail.pas.earthlink.net with smtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 18TRVc-0005ue-00 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 31 Dec 2002 10:53:01 -0800 X-Original-Message-ID: <005101c2b0fe$140be1e0$12c9bb3f@f3g6s4> Reply-To: "Dan Schaefer" From: "Dan Schaefer" X-Original-To: "Lancair list" Subject: Oil recommendation for Lycoming 320? X-Original-Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 10:54:40 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Dan. In the past, Lycoming has recommended straight mineral oil (single weight) for break-in. As I understand it, it's important to use an oil with no friction reducing additives or the break-in could be delayed or even stopped entirely. To properly break-in, parts of the engine (like ring-to-cylinder walls) must break thru the oil barrier and actually wear some. When I received my engine from the factory (a factory re-man O-235), the instructions specifically mandated such oil. I used Shell 100 for about the first 30 hours (changed after the first 5 hours) or so, until oil consumption dropped to around1 qt. in 15 hours. Consumption has remained at that level for over 700 hours so the technique works just fine. I understand that there are some engines (some big Continentals, I think, but maybe more) that can use multi-weight oils - but for a Lyc 320, I would go with a straight mineral oil like Shell 100. It's a tradition that works. Good luck, Dan Schaefer