Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net> (Marvin Kaye)
To: lml
Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 20:45:51 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-1940962@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <Glen.Bien@cox-internet.com>
Received: from [66.76.2.39] (HELO fe2.cox-internet.com)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.3)
  with ESMTP id 1940724 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 10:08:34 -0500
Received: from cox-internet.com ([66.233.88.253]) by fe2.cox-internet.com
          (InterMail vK.4.04.00.00 201-232-137 license 9a2f9096933fa391a6c2fc942f8b01bd)
          with ESMTP id <20021228150834.EQWZ19817.fe2@cox-internet.com>
          for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Sat, 28 Dec 2002 09:08:34 -0600
X-Original-Message-ID: <3E0DBE72.6000503@cox-internet.com>
X-Original-Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2002 09:08:34 -0600
From: Glen Bien <Glen.Bien@cox-internet.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823 Netscape/7.0
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List <lml@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: LASAR Ignition
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Bill or Sue,
Can you comment on the performance and economy change from before the 
LASAR ignition to after?

How do you quantify the difference is it performance or economy or both?

Thanks