Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2002 19:43:08 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-d06.mx.aol.com ([205.188.157.38] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0.2) with ESMTP id 1898347 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 09 Dec 2002 19:08:02 -0500 Received: from Sky2high@aol.com by imo-d06.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v34.13.) id q.37.318e069c (4328) for ; Mon, 9 Dec 2002 19:07:50 -0500 (EST) From: Sky2high@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <37.318e069c.2b268a55@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2002 19:07:49 EST Subject: Re: [LML] Re: aileron balancing X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_37.318e069c.2b268a55_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 8.0 for Windows US sub 4103 --part1_37.318e069c.2b268a55_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The correct way to balance ailerons is neutral around the hinge line and remember this - 1. Control pushrod attachment will add a mass ahead of the hinge line during 1-G flight. In the case of engine/prop/speed/turbulence induced wing/aileron vibration, the pushrod can also load and unload on the aileron - but ahead of the hinge line. 2. At least in 320/360's, there is plenty of pushrod "lash" in the aileron system - this can lead to "buzz" even with weight balancer stiffeners. Ailerons at cruise neutral have very little "load" on them so, just a suggestion, consider rigging both ailerons slightly "up", thus generating a wee air load to eliminate the lash dead band. Scott Krueger N92EX PS On my airplane, the 1/2 moon weights extended almost the full length of the curved leading edge before painting. I had to add about 1.5 inches of 1/2 moon weight after painting. I don't have the stiffeners that many have mentioned (this was a slow build 320, kit circa 1989) and, rigged slightly up, the ailerons exhibit no tendency to vibrate. Perhaps the number of times I heated the curved leading edge for fit (before and after glassing) added to their stiffness. No micro fill was used to finish the fit to the wing. --part1_37.318e069c.2b268a55_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The correct way to balance ailerons is neutral around the hinge line and remember this -

1. Control pushrod attachment will add a mass ahead of the hinge line during 1-G flight.  In the case of engine/prop/speed/turbulence induced wing/aileron vibration, the pushrod can also load and unload on the aileron - but ahead of the hinge line.

2.  At least in 320/360's, there is plenty of pushrod "lash" in the aileron system - this can lead to "buzz" even with weight balancer stiffeners.   Ailerons at cruise neutral have very little "load" on them so, just a suggestion, consider rigging both ailerons slightly "up", thus generating a wee air load to eliminate the lash dead band.

Scott Krueger
N92EX

PS On my airplane, the 1/2 moon weights extended almost the full length of the curved leading edge before painting.  I had to add about 1.5 inches of 1/2 moon weight after painting.  I don't have the stiffeners that many have mentioned (this was a slow build 320, kit circa 1989) and, rigged slightly up, the ailerons exhibit no tendency to vibrate.  Perhaps the number of times I heated the curved leading edge for fit (before and after glassing) added to their stiffness.  No micro fill was used to finish the fit to the wing.
--part1_37.318e069c.2b268a55_boundary--