|
|
Ted Stanley wrote:
Go to the links and you can see some REPORTED details, one of which was:
"FAA records indicate the plane was flying under a temporary certificate
that was issued on Sept. 10 of this year and expired on Oct. 10."
That detail was "REPORTED" by the media and not the FAA. Considering my recent brushes with the media, I would consider anything I see in a news paper to be suspect at best and a fabrication to enhance a story a possible scenario. Just because they claim to be quoting an official source does not preclude the information from being a bold faced lie. Hamid
|
|