Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [65.33.166.167] (account <marv@lancaironline.net>)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.0)
  with HTTP id 1848075 for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 19:28:22 -0500
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] To Rick Schrameck
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro Web Mailer v.4.0
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 19:28:22 -0500
Message-ID: <web-1848075@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <52548863F8A5D411B530005004759A9339163E@QBERT>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for George Braly <gwbraly@gami.com>:
Doug,

Was Duke in experimental (either R & D, Show Compliance, or Market Research)
???

If it was in experimental, did the authorization allow for IFR flight?   If
it did, that is a bit unusual for current day experimental classifications
of certified aircraft.  I would like to know how you did that, as my
MIDO/FSDO/ACO will not allow that.

Regards,  George 



>>>You are correct Rick that the Duke crashed last week on Wednesday night in
IFR conditions with the loss of two of our own.  Rather than wait for the
NTSB report that will reveal the details of the accident, and rather than<<<<