Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 14:47:15 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from smtp.perigee.net ([166.82.201.14] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b8) with ESMTP id 1793649 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 09:13:45 -0400 Received: from perigee.net (dial1-180.clt.perigee.net [166.82.201.180]) by smtp.perigee.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g8TDDYmW029441 for ; Sun, 29 Sep 2002 09:13:44 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <3D96FC88.E3413F8E@perigee.net> X-Original-Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 09:13:44 -0400 From: John Schroeder X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: " (Lancair Mailing List)" Subject: Re: [LML] elevator balancing References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Glasair does it this way for their Super IIS, for sure, and probably for their other models as well - reasonably sure on this. John Schroeder Gary Casey wrote: > I am certainly not the expert, but have a couple of observations: First, > the elevators aren't uniformly balanced anyway as the weights are at the > ends. Not being balanced end-to-end, though, could be a little troubling. > The best way may be to take some weight out of the "overbalanced" one and > then use the center weight to bring it up to balance, creating three weights > that distribute the balance.