Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 11:31:15 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from clmboh1-smtp3.columbus.rr.com ([65.24.0.112] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b7) with ESMTP id 1713402 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 11:19:13 -0400 Received: from NOTEBOOK (dhcp9570127.columbus.rr.com [24.95.70.127]) by clmboh1-smtp3.columbus.rr.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with SMTP id g7SFJAe23266 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2002 11:19:10 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-Message-ID: <003f01c24ea6$3db98020$6601a8c0@NOTEBOOK> From: "Joseph Trepicone" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Fw: FYI- Darus Zehrbach - learn ALL the facts first X-Original-Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 11:18:55 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_003C_01C24E84.B23284A0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_003C_01C24E84.B23284A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Group, Quickly I must apologize to you members of this group for wasting even = more of your time on this subject. This is my last post on the subject = I promise. Cy Galley Editor, EAA Safety Programs wrote: "Your example of Wright's "Falling = Waters" is poor. It did fail." (actually it's "Fallingwater" - one word & no "s") I have pilgrimaged to Bear Run no less than 14 times. Each time I = visit I find something new and wonderful to experience. I'm sure scores = of people who have visited the site from all over the world during its = 66 year history would agree. It has survived a flash flood (1956), = major storms in which on one occasion a portion of the terrace beams = were knocked down by a falling tree (1982). Not to mention the numerous = ventilation holes cut into every terrace by the owners (1937-1963). A = failure you say sir?... shame on you Mr. Galley and may the gods of = architecture have mercy on your soul (I'm joking of course) . We can = debate architecture if you like but this is not the time or place. = Personally, I would have been more interested in the opinions of the = "Editor, EAA Safety Programs" on the other 80% or so of my post = regarding the engine design. =20 As for Mr. Wasti. Your opinions are of no interest to me and therefore = I have no comment. Look group all I'm saying is: Then engine exists - the torpedo's in the = water - no one can stop it now, lets just see if its a hit. Now back to my turbine..... best regards, Joe Trepicone ------=_NextPart_000_003C_01C24E84.B23284A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Group,

Quickly I must apologize to you members of this = group=20 for wasting even more of your time on this subject. This = is my=20 last post on the subject I promise.

Cy Galley
Editor, EAA Safety = Programs wrote:=20 "Your example of Wright's "Falling Waters" is poor. It did=20 fail."

(actually it's "Fallingwater" - one word & = no=20 "s")

I have pilgrimaged to Bear Run no = less than 14=20 times. Each time I visit I find something new and wonderful to=20 experience. I'm sure scores of people who have visited the = site from=20 all over the world during its 66 year history would agree. It = has=20 survived a flash flood (1956), major storms in which on one = occasion a=20 portion of the terrace beams were knocked down by a falling tree = (1982). =20 Not to mention the numerous ventilation holes cut into every=20 terrace by the owners (1937-1963). A failure you = say=20 sir?... shame on you Mr. Galley and may the gods of architecture = have mercy=20 on your soul (I'm joking of course) . We can debate=20 architecture if you like but this is not the time or place. = Personally, I would have been more interested in the = opinions of the=20 "Editor, EAA Safety Programs" on the other 80% or so of my post = regarding=20 the engine design.

As for Mr. Wasti. Your opinions are of no = interest=20 to me and therefore I have no comment.

Look group all I'm saying is: Then engine = exists=20 - the torpedo's in the water - no one can stop it now, lets = just see=20 if its a hit.

Now back to my turbine.....

best regards,

Joe Trepicone

------=_NextPart_000_003C_01C24E84.B23284A0--