|
Joseph Trepicone wrote:
With the exception of the
last all of these are proven to be on the Zehrbach engine...
First, not everyone would agree that all the features that you have listed
as desired are actually good. Some may consider one or more of them to be
major negatives.
Second, having something is quite different than it being any good. I would
take a single magneto any day over a badly designed and implemented dual
electronic ignition. Just because an engine has a feature universally accepted
as desired, feature does not mean that that particular implementation is
worth having. You seem to claim that just because the engine has a feature
it must be good. I think few people would be as generous.
As I stated in the beginning
I am not and engine designer or engineer and I do not proclaim to be.
That much is obvious. Quite painfully so, if I may add.
I believe one of the
major problems of this world is the lack of vision by many of us.
I would respectfully suggest that you redirect some of your vision from visionary
activities to seeing the obvious: Anything coming from a convicted crook
is suspect. Couple that with your lack of engineering and engine knowledge
and it becomes painfully apparent to all except you that you have been conned.
The supposed thermal and lubrication benefits of ceramic coatings are not
universally accepted. In fact, it is an issue that has been vigorously debated
here before and most people have dismissed it as yet another con by a convicted
fraud. The fact that you start your list by making that a desired feature
indicates to me that either you have been conned or worse.
and perhaps now Mr.
Zehrbach will continue the tradition.
Pray tell me, how many felony convictions did Mr. Wright have and how many
years did he spend in jail for fraud?
Mr. Trepicone, the underlying theme I see in your post is that you are just
another victim of a con man who is having a very hard time dealing with the
fact that he has been conned.
Regards,
Hamid
|
|