Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [65.173.216.66] (account <marv@lancaironline.net>)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.0b7)
  with HTTP id 1712754 for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 12:32:08 -0400
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: LNC2 tail comm antenna
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro Web Mailer v.4.0b7
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 12:32:08 -0400
Message-ID: <web-1712754@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20020827102635.04615d30@mail.utexas.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for Mark Steitle <msteitle@mail.utexas.edu>:

Curtis,
The RG-400 cable was in fact attached to the antenna (with enough cable to 
reach the panel) and the BNC connector was attached to the "radio" end of the 
cable.  The VSWR meter was then connected to the BNC connector.  So, the test 
did include the antenna and the cable in as close to a "real world" situation 
as I could replicate.  Hope this helps.
Mark