Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [65.173.216.66] (account <marv@lancaironline.net>)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.0b7)
  with HTTP id 1712656 for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Tue, 27 Aug 2002 09:53:26 -0400
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: LNC2 tail comm antenna
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro Web Mailer v.4.0b7
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 09:53:26 -0400
Message-ID: <web-1712656@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <001d01c24dd0$c38b0740$5462e33f@ckrouse>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for "C Krouse" <kc16@qwest.net>:
Mark,

You did not specify whether the test included the cables.  I would expect
the antenna by itself to have a 1.5:1 VSWR or better, but the cable is a
huge factor in whether or not you will stay below a 2:1 ratio.

Curtis