Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 19:58:44 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from smtprelay3.dc3.adelphia.net ([24.50.78.6] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b7) with ESMTP id 1711898 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 09:53:35 -0400 Received: from worldwinds ([207.175.254.66]) by smtprelay3.dc3.adelphia.net (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with SMTP id H1GEL80C.S0C for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 09:53:32 -0400 From: "Gary Casey" X-Original-To: "lancair list" Subject: water in the crankcase X-Original-Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 06:52:14 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 <> Well, you can certainly get rid of most of the water from the oil be running the oil temperature above 200F or so. It doesn't really take temperatures above 212, partly because of altitude and partly because the water will evaporate fairly rapidly below 212. But, remember that the crankcase has only combustion product in it, so it is essentially saturated with water vapor anyway. One solution is to add a positive crankcase ventilation (PCV) the same as cars have had for eons. This won't function any differently in flight, but will pull fresh air into the crankcase at idle. This will purge most of the water vapor from the crankcase before shutdown. It will also increase the oxygen concentration - a bad thing. I don't know if anyone has used a PCV system on an aircraft or not. Gary Casey ES project