Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 22:21:37 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from scanmail4.cableone.net ([24.116.0.124] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b5) with ESMTP id 1641648 for marv@lancaironline.net; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 21:44:20 -0400 Received: from scanmail4.cableone.net ([10.116.0.124]) by scanmail4.cableone.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.687.68); Thu, 18 Jul 2002 18:21:33 -0700 Received: from scanmail4.cableone.net [24.116.0.124] by scanmail4.cableone.net (SMTPD32-7.04) id A99D1A8012C; Thu, 18 Jul 2002 18:21:33 -0700 X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from (248-189.lbcpe.cableone.net [24.116.248.189]) by mail.cableone.net with SMTP (MailShield v2.04 - WIN32 Jul 17 2001 17:12:42); Thu, 18 Jul 2002 18:21:33 -0600 From: "Tony Vaz" X-Original-To: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: RE: [LML] Re: water landings X-Original-Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 20:22:13 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 In-Reply-To: X-SMTP-HELO: tony X-SMTP-MAIL-FROM: tonyvaz@cableone.net X-SMTP-RCPT-TO: marv@lancaironline.net,bbreen@cableone.net,jcurtin@cableone.net,legacy147@cableone.net,bobbrendasell@msn.com,marv@lancaironline.net,bbreen@cableone.net,jcurtin@cableone.net,legacy147@cableone.net,bobbrendasell@msn.com X-SMTP-PEER-INFO: 248-189.lbcpe.cableone.net [24.116.248.189] What, pray tell, will ignite the floating gasoline? By the time it reaches the likely ignition point, the engine, it (the engine) will probably be submerged and will have cooled off to below the autoignition point of aviation gasoline (if it was ever that hot in the first place) The MSDS from my former employer, Chevron, says 824 degrees F...pretty hot for an aircraft engine that uses 100/100 LL, I would think. (reference: http://www.chevron.com/PRODSERV/AVIATION/AVGAS02647.SHTM). Any petroleum product that you would find in an airplane would require an open flame or spark to ignite it when it is at or above its flash point. At its autoignition point, it requires oxygen (not pure, but the kind mixed with Nitrogen commonly called "air") and a hot surface (to get it to its autoignition point). Pure oxygen and petroleum products take on different properties that I am only vaguely familiar with. That's probably only a concern for IV-P drivers and the rest of the high fliers who can get above 15M, not to mention welders and hospital workers. I suppose that there might be some arcing of failed electrical equipment, but that will subside as soon as the water gets there or the battery dies from shorting out. I know we have all seen movies of WWII airplanes crashing into the Pacific with fiery explosions, but weren't most of them already on fire when they hit? I suppose their ordnance may have also had something to do with a source of ignition, as well. Land crashes do not remove any of the legs of the fire triangle like water crashes tend to do (oxygen and heat). If you have a Very pistol or signal flares on board, it would be inadvisable to use them right away, although the unexpected result might aid in the SAR activities. You might not be around to greet the guys in the orange helicopters, however. I'm assuming all this talk about water landings pertains to a controlled/semi-controlled, forced landing of a Lancair product and not a plummet that would break everything up. In the latter case, you are dead, fire or not. May the God (of your choice) help you if you are in an ES or a Columbia or make a wheels down landing in one of the others. Just wondering. Tony Vaz Ex-Navy man (SeaBee) with crash crew and fire fighting experience (no sinking ships, however) Ex-refinery operator/shift supervisor with fire fighting and fire team leadership experience Low-time ASEL/ASES pilot with no crashing experience Part-time grunt/gofer on Legacy #147 "For once you have tasted flight, you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward; For there you have been, and there you long to return." - Leonardo da Vinci -----Original Message----- From: Marvin Kaye [mailto:marv@lancaironline.net] Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 7:03 PM Subject: [LML] Re: water landings Posted for "Cy Galley" : I think that there is a definite FIRE danger. Gasoline floats and can be ignited and you can have a fire especially if the tanks break up. Talk to any Navy man about fires and sinking ships. Granted that water will cool but will not stop the ignition of petroleum products that float and burn on the surface of water. Cy Galley Editor, EAA Safety Programs cgalley@qcbc.org or experimenter@eaa.org ----- Original Message ----- Wrom: FMYXOEAIJJPHSCRTNHGSWZIDR Obviously, we pay a bit more attention to this subject in Hawaii than others might. Personally, I would rather make a forced landing on water than in tough terrain. A big advantage is there is no fire danger. The