Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 21:12:11 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from www.dynacomm.ws ([198.22.63.66] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b4) with ESMTP id 1623291 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 09 Jul 2002 20:54:55 -0400 Received: from [10.0.1.201] (216-234-105-9.ded.det2.hexcom.net [216.234.105.9]) (authenticated) by www.dynacomm.ws (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id g6A0snX15942; Tue, 9 Jul 2002 20:54:49 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: lorn@pop.dynacomm.ws X-Original-Message-Id: X-Original-Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 20:54:50 -0400 X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net From: "Lorn H. Olsen" Subject: Prop Drag X-Original-Cc: gcomfo@tc3net.com, "Jim Greeson" , "Loren Harmon" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Does a fixed pitch or a constant speed prop produce the most drag? When I fly formation with an RV4, the RV4 pilot claims that I can slow down quicker because of my constant speed prop. I claim the same about his fixed pitch. -- Lorn H. 'Feathers' Olsen, MAA, DynaComm, Corp. 248-478-4301, mailto:lorn@dynacomm.ws LNC2, O-320-D1F, N31161, Y47, SE Michigan