Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Sat, 06 Jul 2002 09:59:49 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from smtprelay1.dc3.adelphia.net ([24.50.78.4] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b4) with ESMTP id 1610183 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 06 Jul 2002 09:33:37 -0400 Received: from worldwinds ([207.175.254.66]) by smtprelay1.dc3.adelphia.net (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with SMTP id GYTXO001.L0J for ; Sat, 6 Jul 2002 09:33:36 -0400 From: "Gary Casey" X-Original-To: "lancair list" Subject: carbon fiber X-Original-Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2002 06:33:02 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 <> Yes, but...In an all-carbon structure there is no question. But if one were to build a glass aircraft and then use carbon for all the assembly joints I would be afraid that the elastic modulus miss-match could cause problems. As I recall, carbon composites have a modulus something like twice that of glass and therefore, the joint will not flex with the rest of the structure, causing stress concentrations at the joint. I know that on my ES there are several glass-to-carbon joints and I can only assume that this stress concentration was figured into the design. Gary Casey ES project, still chasing bubbles