Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 11:38:41 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [198.207.223.231] (HELO babbler.bmc.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b2) with ESMTP id 1292150 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 10:15:03 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by babbler.bmc.com (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id g5DEJKD20178 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 09:19:20 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pdavis.bmc.com (pdavis@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.2) with ESMTP id g5DEF3Z27652 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2002 09:15:03 -0500 X-Original-Message-Id: <200206131415.g5DEF3Z27652@localhost.localdomain> X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: pdavis owned process doing -bs X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 Pgp-Action: PGP/MIME-signclear; rfc822=off; originator="Paul Davis " From: "Paul Davis" Reply-to: "Paul Davis" X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net (Lancair Mailing List) Subject: Re: [LML] Re: 360 Stall Speed/Buffet Speed In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 13 Jun 2002 08:49:38 EDT." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Original-Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 09:15:03 -0500 >>>>> On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, "Bill Kennedy" wrote: Bill> I really don't want to offend anyone, but the recent email Bill> justifying fear and avoidance of stall practice/familiarity Bill> is scary. Please think it over and talk with a CFI. That was my first instinct too, but then I realized that I probably wasn't thinking clearly. I'm more used to fairly docile airplanes like Cessnas and Decathlons. I know how to recover from spins in these aircraft, and more importantly, I know the aircraft CAN be recovered. I don't know that about our Legacy. It isn't so easy to recover from spins in some aircraft. I understand that even the best pilot simply can't recover some aircraft in some types of spin. Maybe spin recovery in Lancairs is much harder, or takes longer, than the typical spam can? Maybe there are spins that are stable and simply can't be recovered? I simply don't know and don't want to be the test pilot that finds out. Then there's the added complication that all our aircraft are going to be just a little bit different from one another -- maybe more than a little bit -- so what's true for your airplane might not be true for mine. Guess the bottom line for me is that unless I hear that a bunch of Legacy drivers have done a bunch of spins with no problems, I'm going to avoid them. Absent a spin recovery chute I'm not inclined to try. And since I hear that these very slick airplanes almost always drop a wing in the stall, often rather violently, I'm inclined to avoid even full stalls unless the wheels are inches above pavement. I can certainly see being flicked into an unintended spin or even an inverted spin. Following this reasoning I'll probably never loop or roll our Legacy (but don't hold me to that). I can still remember executing less than perfect rolls and even falling out of loops (long ago). That sort of thing might be disastrous in these airplanes. But if some of you do full stalls and/or spins please let us know. ------------------- Paul Davis Lancair Legacy builder pdavis@bmc.com Phone 713-918-1550 ------------------- Morals are your agreement with yourself to abide by your own rules. To thine own self be true or you spoil the game. --Lazurus Long, Time Enough For Love, pg 586