Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2002 10:41:08 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [198.207.223.231] (HELO babbler.bmc.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.0b2) with ESMTP id 1282985 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 05 Jun 2002 10:31:25 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by babbler.bmc.com (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id g55EZNx16041 for ; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 09:35:23 -0500 (CDT) Received: from pdavis.bmc.com (pdavis@localhost) by localhost.localdomain (8.11.6/8.11.2) with ESMTP id g55EVAK31911 for ; Wed, 5 Jun 2002 09:31:11 -0500 X-Original-Message-Id: <200206051431.g55EVAK31911@localhost.localdomain> X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.localdomain: pdavis owned process doing -bs X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 Pgp-Action: PGP/MIME-signclear; rfc822=off; originator="Paul Davis " From: "Paul Davis" Reply-to: "Paul Davis" X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net (Lancair Mailing List) Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Left Throttle, Right Stick In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 04 Jun 2002 23:11:36 EDT." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Original-Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2002 09:31:10 -0500 Okay, I think we've about beaten this thing to death. Unless someone makes the case that I'm actually decreasing safety my inclination is to add a (simple) second throttle so I can fly with either hand even during takeoff and landing. Think of it as more for my personal comfort rather than a safety of flight issue. Let me just say that I don't think the right-hand/left-hand thing is ever a major concern and isn't even a minor concern MOST of the time. The vast majority of the time it simply doesn't matter. And there are times when even I want to be able to fly left handed -- like when copying a clearance. But to say that it makes absolutely no difference is impossible to support. The truth is that no one has attempted to systematically answer the questions of whether, when or how much it matters. Clearly I have my own opinions, but like everyone else's, they're just opinions until and unless someone actually does the research. If there were a BIG difference, we wouldn't need a carefully controlled study; we'd have crashed enough airplanes for the answer to be obvious. Clearly that hasn't happened. But just as clearly no one is entitled to state categorically that this issue is insignificant, no matter how much personal experience, personal opinion or anecdotal or empirical evidence is presented. For what it's worth, I've written to NASA's Office of Biological and Physical Research asking: 1. Do they know if the question has already been examined? 2. If not, are they interested in pursuing it? 3. If neither 1 or 2, can they suggestion a group with the resources to answer the question -- that might be willing? Anyone here know of such a group? ------------------- Paul Davis Lancair Legacy builder pdavis@bmc.com Phone 713-918-1550 ------------------- Fata viam invenient (Aeneid) The Fates will find a way