From: RWolf99@aol.com
Message-ID: <ae.232c9ff7.29b43dce@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Mar 2002 22:02:38 EST
Subject: Solder vs crimp
To: lancair.list@olsusa.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com

          <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
          <<  Lancair Builders' Mail List  >>
          <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>
For what it is worth --

In the expendable rocket world it is routine to thermal cycle cables that 
have soldered connections (solder cups on the connector pins) but not to do 
so with crimp connections.  Poor solder joints would often be detected by 
continuity loss, particularly at cold temperatures.  I think we went down to 
-40F.  This is not to say that solder is inferior to crimp, or the other way, 
that crimp is superior to solder.  It's just an interesting little-known fact.

Which, by the way, is totally irrelevant to Brent's point, which is that he 
feels that a splice is superior to a connector.  I don't doubt that a splice 
can be made more reliable than a connector, but I think there are many places 
where it makes sense to have a connector for maintainability.  Brent 
disagrees, but that's his prerogative.

- Rob Wolf
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
LML website:   http://members.olsusa.com/mkaye/maillist.html
LML Builders' Bookstore:   http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair
Please remember that purchases from the Builders' Bookstore
assist with the management of the LML.

Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>