Return-Path: Received: from pop3.olsusa.com ([63.150.212.2] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.4) with ESMTP id 1042638 for rob@logan.com; Fri, 08 Feb 2002 08:52:10 -0500 Received: from falcon.prod.itd.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.74]) by pop3.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-71866U8000L800S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2002 01:50:21 -0500 Received: from sdn-ar-012orportp271.dialsprint.net ([63.180.48.73] helo=f3g6s4) by falcon.prod.itd.earthlink.net with smtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 16Z4tY-0000lt-00 for lancair.list@olsusa.com; Thu, 07 Feb 2002 22:52:28 -0800 Message-ID: <000b01c1b06d$7fa491a0$4930b43f@f3g6s4> Reply-To: "Dan Schaefer" Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com From: "Dan Schaefer" To: "Lancair list" Subject: Stall Warning/AOA Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 22:54:45 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >Has anyone used the mechanical tab style angle of attack warning that is used on most light general >aviation airplanes on a lancair? Not advisable. After going to all the trouble of building an airplane which incorporates a relatively high-tech NLF airfoil (Natural Laminar Flow), sticking something like a stall-warning-tab out in front seems quite counterproductive. You can get the tech paper on the NLF series of airfoils from NASA (a lot of the development work on these airfoils was done there, in the '70's or '80's, I think). You will note that it is too easy to disrupt the laminar, flow resulting in a sudden increase in drag. I've related this story before, but for those who haven't seen it, I'll say again. I encountered a cloud of bugs on climb-out from Tonopah, Nev. a couple of years ago. didn't realize it at the time but I had coated the leading edge of my wings with a gazillion of the critters. When I leveled off and tried to accelerate to cruise speed, no soap! I actually thought that maybe my nose gear door had closed before the gear was all the way up (I had had that problem early on) so I slowed to gear speed and cycled the gear. Still couldn't get to more than about 140 MPH IAS and the airplane felt odd - it just wasn't as crisp on the controls as I was used to. Deciding that I must have a very large problem that I couldn't diagnose in flight, I landed at the nearest airport. When I ran my hand over the forward third of the wings, they felt like sandpaper! Looking close, I could see that the sticky little bug-guts (they were about the size of gnats) had glued themselves to the wing surface by the untold (previously mentioned) gazillions. After a very thorough inspection of the rest of the airplane and finding nothing amiss, I got out my trusty Formula 409 and cleaned off the passengers. The rest of the flight home was normal and uneventful. No problem attaining normal cruise speed, etc., etc. >From this I conclude that one may not want to stick a protrusion into the airstream ahead of the wing. Dan Schaefer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://members.olsusa.com/mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please remember that purchases from the Builders' Bookstore assist with the management of the LML. Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>