Return-Path: Received: from pop3.olsusa.com ([63.150.212.2] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5b3) with ESMTP id 869360 for rob@logan.com; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 04:33:12 -0400 Received: from smtp.olsusa.com ([63.150.212.3]) by pop3.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-71866U8000L800S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 04:20:33 -0400 Received: from ws-01.olsusa.com ([207.30.195.51]) by smtp.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Sat, 22 Sep 2001 04:22:53 -0400 Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20010922043359.00a31960@pop3.olsusa.com> Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 04:34:20 -0400 To: lancair.list@olsusa.com From: JMcKibbin@aol.com (by way of Marvin Kaye ) Subject: Re: 6' Fuel Probes Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> FOR LML On 9/20/01 Bill Kennedy described a fuel level measuring system using a capacitance probe mounted in a standpipe which is located in the wing root and then asked if he was missing something. Yes, Bill, either you are missing something or I am. My presumption is that you have based your design on that old truism that a liquid will always seek its own level. If this truism were true in this case, then the level in the standpipe would be the same as the level in the tank and your system would work fine. Trouble is, there is a caveat that goes along with that truism that is often ignored and that is that the gas pressure on top of the liquid on both sides must be EXACTLY the same if the levels are to be the same. If the pressure above the fuel in the tank is different than the pressure above the fuel in the standpipe then you have created a manometer and the pressure difference will result in a corresponding difference in level. In this case, the pressure above the fuel in the tank is the pressure created by the ram (dynamic) air pressure on the fuel tank vent. Theoretical ram air pressure is about 1.5 inches of mercury above static at 200 mph and sea level. This is equivalent to a column of gasoline about 26 inches above static pressure. While a fuel tank vent will not convert all of this ram air pressure to static, it will recover a significant part of it. If we assume that half of it was recovered and your standpipe were vented to an area of pressure which was equal to the free stream static pressure then the level in the standpipe would be some 13 inches above the level in the tank and, unless the vent was very high, fuel would be coming out of the standpipe vent! Keep in mind that the level you are trying to measure only varies about 9 inches (IIRC) from full to empty so the introduction of even very small pressure differences will result in a large error in the fuel quantity measurement. Since you didn't explain where or how or if you vented the standpipe, I can't comment on your particular design any further but I think most venting options have been considered in the past and none, to my knowledge, have ever been successful. These include not venting the standpipe at all, venting it in the cabin (!), putting a ram air collector on the standpipe vent, venting the top of the standpipe to the tank vent space by routing tubing down to the wing root and then out to the wing tip, etc. If you wish to pursue this further, please describe how you intend to vent the standpipe and I will comment in more detail. Jim McKibbin >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>