Return-Path: Received: from imo15.mx.aol.com ([198.81.17.5]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.1.2 release (PO203-101c) ID# 0-44819U2500L250S0) with ESMTP id AAA603 for ; Sat, 7 Nov 1998 11:12:04 -0500 Received: from ReganRanch@aol.com by imo15.mx.aol.com (IMOv16.10) id 8COEa02538 for ; Sat, 7 Nov 1998 11:11:44 -0500 (EST) From: ReganRanch@aol.com Message-ID: Date: Sat, 7 Nov 1998 11:11:44 EST To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Subject: Hot time in a IV-P X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> In a message dated 98-11-06 23:33:19 EST, you write: << Other opinions/observations?? Info/sources of A/C systems for an IVP?? >> Living in the CA Central Valley I have lots of experience with hot weather. My standard operating procedure on a hot day is to start and taxi with the door open, run-up, takeoff and climb to 8K with the door seal off (this allows lots of airflow into the cabin), seal the cabin and pressurize, heat on above FL250. Using this procedure has the same relative discomfort as driving a car without AC and the windows open. I really don't see the logic in adding AC. By the time the AC is effective, you are ready for takeoff and wont need it in another 10 minutes. Then there is weight, drag, reliability and maintenance. The AC condenser pods seem to reduce IAS by about 10Kts, this has a big negative impact on engine cooling. If you had to have supplemental cooling then I would make a large, parallel, Peltier device (solid state heat pump used in ice chests and RV refrigerators) and build it into the upper aft pressure bulkhead. The existing cabin fan would circulate cool air and a fan in the baggage compartment would take away heat. A second alternator would provide the 1.5KW needed for the system (and emergency power in a pinch). The entire installation would weigh less than 10 lbs and add no drag. Food for thought. Regards Brent