Return-Path: Received: from www01.netaddress.usa.net ([204.68.24.21]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.1.2 release (PO203-101c) ID# 0-44819U2500L250S0) with SMTP id AAA27399 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 1998 14:54:31 -0500 Received: (qmail 19804 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Nov 1998 19:54:44 -0000 Message-ID: <19981105195444.19803.qmail@www01.netaddress.usa.net> Date: Thu, 05 Nov 1998 19:54:44 From: Dan Schaefer To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Subject: Alternator blast-tubes X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> To Pete Cavitt. When I was installing my alternator, I had a conversation with Bob Nuckolls, of Aeroelectric Connections, about the desireability of an alternator blast-tube for cooling. I had planned to install one but Bob was adamant about it being more detrimental than helpful because of the chance of introducing water into the alternator if you should fly through rain (hard to avoid, sometimes). You might figure out a way to make a centrifugal water separator as part of the ducting but it's probably more trouble than it's worth. I have one of the small 30 amp experimental units (don't remember the brand right off, but it's the one from Spruce) and have had no trouble with it in more than 460 hours, without applying any direct cooling. While the environment under the cowl is pretty harsh from our point of view, the materials in an alternator probably aren't stressed much by them - even the silicon rectifiers should stand up to 125 C and the wire, steel and aluminum parts higher still. Cheers, Dan Schaefer ____________________________________________________________________ Get free e-mail and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1