Return-Path: Received: from pop3.olsusa.com ([63.150.212.2] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.7) with ESMTP id 796766 for rob@logan.com; Thu, 07 Jun 2001 18:18:52 -0400 Received: from CyberPro.MAIL ([196.37.249.19]) by pop3.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-71175U5500L550S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Thu, 7 Jun 2001 16:36:13 -0400 Received: from pine by cpro.co.za with SMTP (MDaemon.v3.0.4.R) for ; Thu, 07 Jun 2001 22:58:49 +0200 Message-ID: <001d01c0ef93$1cae7480$56d21ac4@pine> Reply-To: "AP Pienaar" Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com From: "AP Pienaar" To: "LancairList" Cc: "Mark Mahnke" Subject: LNC2 Nose gear angle Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 22:46:35 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Hi The original plans that came with my 1991 model 320 showed the nose gear angle to be 8 deg. The newer plans received from Vern shows it at 4 deg. When I drilled the holes through the phenolic I was stunned with the fact that the holes wasn't in the center of the phenolic block but rather towards the back. But the double check on the plans showed my measurements to be correct. Now a year later, after looking at a friends flying plane (which happens to be #667 mine is #664) I realized the visual difference and checked the old plans. Would this be a typo. Please help!! Pine Pienaar pine@cpro.co.za Lancair 360 #664 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>