Return-Path: <daveleonard@cox.net>
Received: from fed1rmmtao04.cox.net ([68.230.241.35] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b8)
  with ESMTP id 323748 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 12:23:57 -0400
Received-SPF: error
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.35; envelope-from=daveleonard@cox.net
Received: from davidandanne ([68.111.224.107]) by fed1rmmtao04.cox.net
          (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with SMTP
          id <20040716162326.MMAR5426.fed1rmmtao04.cox.net@davidandanne>
          for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>;
          Fri, 16 Jul 2004 12:23:26 -0400
From: "DaveLeonard" <daveleonard@cox.net>
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] Oil hose size
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 09:23:27 -0700
Message-ID: <PIEMJLCHGPKMFMDHBKMLKEADCEAA.daveleonard@cox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
In-Reply-To: <list-322851@logan.com>
Importance: Normal

Bulent, I am using -8 oil line.  There is no question that -8 is adequate.
The important thing IMHO is a large enough rad being fed enough air
(whatever that is).

Dave Leonard


>
>
> Guys and Girls,
> What size and type hose is recommended for the oil system. I salvaged all
> the original fittings, so I have to make new hoses with the old banjo
> fittings.
> I'm not crazy about the external stainless braid. Internal braid is more
> useful I think? And I'm installing fire sleeve all the oil hoses.
> Bulent
>
>
>
> >>  Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
> >>  Archive:   http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html
>