Return-Path: Received: from imf16aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.64] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b8) with ESMTP id 323137 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 01:28:25 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.64; envelope-from=atlasyts@bellsouth.net Received: from [65.11.54.150] by imf16aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.08 201-253-122-130-108-20031117) with ESMTP id <20040716052754.MFQN1705.imf16aec.mail.bellsouth.net@[65.11.54.150]> for ; Fri, 16 Jul 2004 01:27:54 -0400 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.4.030702.0 Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 01:27:32 -0400 Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: New Scoop From: Bulent Aliev To: Rotary motors in aircraft Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3172786054_77967848" > This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --B_3172786054_77967848 Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable On 7/16/04 1:15 AM, "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> wrote: >=20 >=20 > Thanks for the update. Looks alot like mine, so maybe the difference is = in > the duct work?? Would like to see the difference when the EWP drops off.= Is > it in series with the engine pump? >=20 > I tried to apply some of Ed's Law to the ducting of the radiators, and th= ough > I didn't get it perfect, it's probably far superior to what I would have = done > without his guidance. The oil cooler scoop isn't quite as well shaped, a= nd > perhaps it shows in the temps. I'm also running only 25% coolant, with 4= oz > per gallon water wetter, which might help the heat transfer. More than e= nough > freeze protection for North FL. >=20 > Rusty (off to bed, to have nightmares about the pager going off at 7:00 a= m...) >=20 Here are two of Griffin Radiator FAQ=B9s: 11) What coolant to water ratio should I be using? Generally the coolant to water ratio should be 50/50. 12) Should I run Redline "water wetter" in your radiator? Redline "water wetter" is more costly than premium antifreeze, with no apparent advantages. Bulent --B_3172786054_77967848 Content-type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Re: [FlyRotary] Re: New Scoop On 7/16/04 1:15 AM, &qu= ot;Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> wrote:



Thanks for the update.  Looks alot like mine, so maybe the difference = is in the duct work??  Would like to see the difference when the EWP dr= ops off.  Is it in series with the engine pump?

I tried to apply some of Ed's Law to the ducting o= f the radiators, and though I didn't get it perfect, it's probably far super= ior to what I would have done without his guidance.  The oil cooler sco= op isn't quite as well shaped, and perhaps it shows in the temps.  I'm = also running only 25% coolant, with 4 oz per gallon water wetter, which migh= t help the heat transfer.  More than enough freeze protection for North= FL.  

Rusty (off to bed, to have nightmares about the pa= ger going off at 7:00 am...)


Here are two of Griffin Radiator FAQ’s:

11)= What coolant to water ratio should I be using?
Generally the coolant to water ratio should be 50/50.

12) Should I run Redline "water wetter" in your radiator?
Redline "water wetter" is more costly than premium antifreeze, wi= th no apparent advantages.

Bulent --B_3172786054_77967848--