Return-Path: Received: from tuc-relay-1.splasers.com ([65.121.133.163] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b5) with ESMTP id 163523 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 12:33:18 -0400 Received: from usmtv-mx01.spectra-physics.com ([10.209.9.220]) by tuc-relay-1.splasers.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i5FGWHD4030825 for ; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 09:32:24 -0700 Received: by usmtv-mx01.spectra-physics.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Tue, 15 Jun 2004 09:32:15 -0700 Message-ID: <5FA49D34561C5945BA9258B31BF64880DB843B@usmtv-mx01.spectra-physics.com> From: "Wynn, Mike" To: flyrotary@lancaironline.net Subject: alternator redundancy Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 09:32:09 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Dear All, There was a thread a while back in which one of our colleagues suggested the possibility for a second alternator perhaps mounted on the PSRU?? Could be a lighter option for redundancy than two batteries Did this go anywhere? Mike