|
Message
Your new intake
looks good from the bottom, err I guess for you, its the side {:>).
Lets see some of the other side.
I don't think working on these fiberglass ducts is
going to substitute for flying, I'd come visit you, but its a single seater
{:<(
I am thinking about something along the same lines
for my next manifold. Part of the lack of any thing (increase or decrease)
in the air with my variable manifold I believe in part due to having the two
tubes too close. The turn at the top was so tight that it probably looked
a lot like the end of a tube to the wave. Also I know the bottom manifold
was bad for air flow.
Using the IDA type manifold spreads the tubes from
90mm CL to 120 mm CL apart and that would permit a gentler bend for the
wave. Well, something to do when I get finished with the
ducts.
So keep reporting as I am very
interested.
Ed
Ed Anderson
RV-6A N494BW Rotary Powered
Matthews, NC
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2004 9:19 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Rev-2.1 part 1
Heah, RD. How about a pix of the
TB/intake?
TJ<><
You're in
luck. I actually took the camera today :-) I scaled these way down from the default resolution, but
I'm going to send them in three posts to avoid ringing the bell on Marvin's
software.
Rusty
>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/
>>
Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html
|