Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #8721
From: Ed Anderson <eanderson@carolina.rr.com>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] intake #3 +150 rpm
Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 22:43:16 -0400
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Message
Now that's more like it, Rusty.  I do find it interesting the you get less rpm with the sceet tubing.  I gain approx 200 rpm when I use it, but that may be because it gets its air from my chin scoop for the oil cooler and I suspect the prop helps stuff a little more air in the tube.    But, in any case, your RV-3 should do very nicely with that static rpm - using Tracy's prop I presume?
 
A plenum may or may not assist with the airflow, convention wisdom is that it does, but I think it depends on the rest of your intake, they have to play as a team or else they can hurt performance.  Be interesting to see what difference it makes.
 
Ed
 
Ed Anderson
RV-6A N494BW Rotary Powered
Matthews, NC
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, May 30, 2004 10:22 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] intake #3 +150 rpm

Greetings,
 

I installed the 3rd intake today, and got it running.   It looks great to me, but you'll have to take my word for it, because I forgot my camera.  I could maintain 5000-5050 static, and saw brief flashes of 5100, so this is a good improvement.  I ended up gaining an honest 150 rpm.  I played with the timing some, and maybe gained 50 rpm.  I think the gain from timing has more to do with how well you’re timed statically to start with. 

 

This rpm was with the TB open, rather than ducted to the radiator intake with 1.75” sceet tubing for each barrel.  Before, when I removed the duct from the old intake, I only gained about 50 rpm.  Now,  I get 5000 without the duct, and 4600 with it.  Ain’t gonna be using that duct.  Overall, the intake is a keeper, and I still need to do a few final tasks, such as adding a brace for the TB, so it isn’t supported by my poor welds of the intake pipe.  I also need to make a heat shield to go between the intake/fuel rails and the exhaust.  Full tuning is of course in order, but the biggest thing remaining is some sort of plenum upstream of the TB.  At the moment, I haven't a clue what I'll do with this. 

 

The stock Mazda 550 injectors still require about 180 degrees less mixture knob, than the MSD 525 injectors that are being used as secondaries.  I'll end up using those 440's that Tommy sent for the primaries, but not until I have some other reason to remove the intake.  Still, it will idle fine down to 1200 rpm, which may be just fine for a ported engine. 

 

Cheers,

Rusty (No flying until I get inspired about the plenum)

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster