From: "Tracy Crook" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: 50 HP rotary engine? Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 00:10:09 +0000 Content-Type: Multipart/alternative; boundary="NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_385_1085883623_1" --NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_385_1085883623_1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: 50 HP rotary engine? Much as I hate to say it, you will probably be better off with a mor= e common UL motor for this one. =20 Thanks to everyone for the info. Looks like you're probably right about = the 2-stroke for the Airbike, probably a 503. =20 Cheers, Rusty (Airbike wing kit materials shipped today) =20 I concur. I've been looking for a good replacement for my 503 (Kolb Twi= nstar) for years. When it flys again, it will probably be with the 503 t= hat has powered it for 800 hours. Tracy --NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_385_1085883623_1 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Subject: [FlyRot= ary] Re: 50 HP rotary engine?

=

= Much as I hate to say it, you will probably be better off with a more co= mmon UL motor for this one. =

Thanks to everyone&= nbsp;for the info. Looks like you're probably right about the 2-str= oke for the Airbike, probably a 503.
=

Cheers,=

Rusty (Airbike wing kit materials shipped today)

<= /DIV>
I concur. I've been loo= king for a good replacement for my 503 (Kolb Twinstar) for years.&n= bsp; When it flys again, it will probably be with the 503 that has powere= d it for 800 hours.

Tracy

--NextPart_Webmail_9m3u9jl4l_385_1085883623_1--