Return-Path: <keltro@att.net>
Received: from mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net ([204.127.131.115] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b3)
  with ESMTP id 87607 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 24 May 2004 14:11:59 -0400
Received: from 204.127.135.60 ([204.127.135.60])
          by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc11) with SMTP
          id <20040524181152111002l2cme>; Mon, 24 May 2004 18:11:52 +0000
Received: from [209.247.222.109] by 204.127.135.60;
	Mon, 24 May 2004 18:11:52 +0000
From: keltro@att.net
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: RD1C to FC Housing
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 18:11:52 +0000
Message-Id: <052420041811.16226.40B23AE7000BC7BF00003F622160383116FF908D8B939A@att.net>
X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Mar 24 2004)
X-Authenticated-Sender: a2VsdHJvQGF0dC5uZXQ=

  Jim,

   I do not have all the numbers in front of me at the moment

 as to the weight. The FC housing is a pressure casting and

 relatively light. The primary difference will be a forward

 (Tractor A/C) movement of the 13B C/G. My motive is to put

 the prop forward and have the eng cowl fair directly into

 the radius of the 16 inch spinner.

    Kelly

Dyke Delta/13B/RD1C/EC2 
		
			
			
			


> Kelly,
> Have you determined the weight difference between 
> the "standard" Tracy gearbox support and the 
> bellhousing approach?
> Just wondering what was your reasoning for deciding on
> this approach.
> Jim Maher
> 
> --- Original Message ---
> From: keltro@att.net
> To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" 
> <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
> Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: RD1C to FC Housing
> Bulent,
> I could not stand you being the only one with a long
> nose (Tail in your case). My RD1C on 86-88 (FC) auto 
> trans
> bell-housing.
> Kelly Troyer
> 
> 
> 
> >>  Homepage:  http://www.flyrotary.com/
> >>  Archive:   http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html