Return-Path: <DELTAFLYER@prodigy.net>
Received: from pimout1-ext.prodigy.net ([207.115.63.77] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b3)
  with ESMTP id 87529 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 24 May 2004 13:08:25 -0400
Received: from enroll02.prodigy.net (enroll02-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.61.26])
	by pimout1-ext.prodigy.net (8.12.10 milter /8.12.10) with SMTP id i4OH8NK1168174
	for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 24 May 2004 13:08:24 -0400
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Message-Id: <AA-08578408E402EB8EE12D3D668B4FC9FB-ZZ@enroll02.prodigy.net>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 13:08:23 -0500
From: DELTAFLYER@prodigy.net
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: RD1C to FC Housing

Kelly,
Have you determined the weight difference between 
the "standard" Tracy gearbox support and the 
bellhousing approach?
Just wondering what was your reasoning for deciding on
this approach.
Jim Maher

--- Original Message ---
From: keltro@att.net
To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" 
<flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: RD1C to FC Housing
Bulent,
I could not stand you being the only one with a long
nose (Tail in your case). My RD1C on 86-88 (FC) auto 
trans
bell-housing.
Kelly Troyer