Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #8551
From: William <wschertz@ispwest.com>
Subject: Re:Beam Motor Mount
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 22:20:28 -0500
To: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
The need for the side bolts was pointed out by an alert reader on one of these lists -- that is what I like, the instant feedback that allows evolution. Now I just have to get the welding done.
Bill Schertz
KIS Cruiser # 4045
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2004 5:08 PM
Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Beam Motor Mount (semi-long)

Good points Bill and I fully agree that the Shertz Beam is infinitely preferable to the 'Mount on the adapter plate' scheme.
 
The only point which truly affects safety is the point about stress on the bolts.  In the original configuration, the six bolts are all in a row and going on 'gut feel' stress analysis, this will result in >= 90%  of the force in tension being placed on a single 6mm bolt (the one on the end).  If this bolt fails, the rest of them would break in quick succession. The geometry is such that the force will increase as the next bolt in line will see an ever increasing load as the one outboard of it fails.
 
The fix that you proposed (tying the beam to more bolts along the side of the engine) should work well and this removes any concern I had about its safety as long as the rear mount is properly handled.  This is much easier on composite structures than on 'beer can' designs.
 
Tracy Crook
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster