Return-Path: Received: from [24.25.9.103] (HELO ms-smtp-04-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b3) with ESMTP id 86281 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sun, 23 May 2004 20:00:26 -0400 Received: from EDWARD (clt25-78-058.carolina.rr.com [24.25.78.58]) by ms-smtp-04-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id i4O00OVw029048 for ; Sun, 23 May 2004 20:00:25 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <005101c44122$20b14b00$2402a8c0@EDWARD> From: "Ed Anderson" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Fiberglass Help! Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 20:00:30 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Maher" To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2004 6:14 PM Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Fiberglass Help! Ed, I have used the 7781 satin crowfoot weave with much success. It has a much higher thread count which gives a smoother finish with less or no pinholes while using less epoxy because of less space between the threads to be filled. The weight is 8.9 ounces. It also handles compound curves better than BID in my opinion. Jim Maher Hi Jim, Thanks for the information, I thought I might have screwed up ordering the Crowfoot weave, but sounds like it will be ideal. The weight I ordered might be a bit on the light side at 3 3/4 oz, but I figure I can add another layer (or two) if necessary. Ed