Return-Path: Received: from relay04.roc.ny.frontiernet.net ([66.133.131.37] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 3103240 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Sat, 20 Mar 2004 01:02:52 -0500 Received: (qmail 28203 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2004 06:02:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO frontiernet.net) ([170.215.103.239]) (envelope-sender ) by relay04.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (FrontierMTA 2.3.7b) with SMTP for ; 20 Mar 2004 06:02:52 -0000 Message-ID: <405BDEBA.9B1A6467@frontiernet.net> Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 00:03:38 -0600 From: Jim Sower X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: P51 scoop - splitting feeds? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <... how close to the mouth of the scoop should it be ...> I would be inclined to make the best (longest), plenum I could for best pressure recovery and then, split off if I have to (I plan to have the plenum serve both radiators and oil coolers sort of like John Slade. I would have a separate intake for intercooler. I would put cabin feeds in the front of the airplane by the cabin Just a theory ... Jim S. Chad Robinson wrote: > Bulent Aliev wrote: > > On 3/19/04 10:55 AM, "Chad Robinson" wrote: > > > > > >>How are people splitting air from scoops into intake, cabin cooling, and > >>radiator feeds? Are you just partitioning the scoop into separate output > >>feeds? If so, how large should I make the feed to the intake air for the > >>engine, and should it have a bypass to allow unused air to escape, or should I > >>just feed it to the engine compartment/cowl and let the intake pull out what > >>it will? > >> > >>I'm planning a single P51-style scoop that drops below the boundary layer, and > >>I'd like to avoid having separate/extra armpit or similar scoops for other air > >>supplies. > >> > >>Thanks, > >>Chad > >> > > > > What airplane are you building Chad? > > This is for a Cozy MKIV. This scoop is not set in stone but of all the methods > I've seen I like it the best so far. If I can make the scoop an inch larger on > one dimension and avoid an armpit scoop or similar for intake air, for > instance, that would make me happy. But I don't know if it's enough to simply > partition the scoop to achieve this, or something else is required. If a > partition is the way to go, how close to the mouth of the scoop should it be? > > Regards, > Chad > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > >> Archive: http://lancaironline.net/lists/flyrotary/List.html -- Jim Sower ... Destiny's Plaything Crossville, TN; Chapter 5 Long-EZ N83RT, Velocity N4095T