Return-Path: Received: from border.rfgonline.com ([65.171.123.242] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP-TLS id 3102973 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 19:51:27 -0500 Received: (qmail 27135 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2004 19:39:18 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO EXCHANGE.rfgonline.com) (192.168.150.101) by 192.168.150.1 with SMTP; 19 Mar 2004 19:39:18 -0500 Received: from rfgonline.com ([192.168.150.72]) by EXCHANGE.rfgonline.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Fri, 19 Mar 2004 19:51:26 -0500 Message-ID: <405B95A0.70203@rfgonline.com> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 19:51:44 -0500 From: Chad Robinson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rotary motors in aircraft Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: P51 scoop - splitting feeds? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-Path: crobinson@rfgonline.com X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Mar 2004 00:51:26.0500 (UTC) FILETIME=[7946C640:01C40E15] Bulent Aliev wrote: > On 3/19/04 10:55 AM, "Chad Robinson" wrote: > > >>How are people splitting air from scoops into intake, cabin cooling, and >>radiator feeds? Are you just partitioning the scoop into separate output >>feeds? If so, how large should I make the feed to the intake air for the >>engine, and should it have a bypass to allow unused air to escape, or should I >>just feed it to the engine compartment/cowl and let the intake pull out what >>it will? >> >>I'm planning a single P51-style scoop that drops below the boundary layer, and >>I'd like to avoid having separate/extra armpit or similar scoops for other air >>supplies. >> >>Thanks, >>Chad >> > > What airplane are you building Chad? This is for a Cozy MKIV. This scoop is not set in stone but of all the methods I've seen I like it the best so far. If I can make the scoop an inch larger on one dimension and avoid an armpit scoop or similar for intake air, for instance, that would make me happy. But I don't know if it's enough to simply partition the scoop to achieve this, or something else is required. If a partition is the way to go, how close to the mouth of the scoop should it be? Regards, Chad