Mailing List flyrotary@lancaironline.net Message #6603
From: Ed Anderson <eanderson@carolina.rr.com>
Subject: Cooling Ducts
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 09:46:09 -0500
To: Russell Duffy <13brv3@bellsouth.net>, Russell Duffy <rv82@home.com>
Cc: Rotary motors in aircraft <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>
Hi Rusty,
 
    Saw where you are about to start your radiator ducts.  Here is some food for thought.  I am convinced based on my research, some e mail exchanges with the person who wrote the recent cooling article in KITPLANE and my own experimentation that probably the best diffuser approach practical for our aircraft type is a truncation of the K&W Streamlined Diffuser duct.
 
The expert and I agreed that provided you truncate the streamline diffuser from the inlet end that you should lose very little efficiency so long as the rapidly divergence in the "Bell Shaped" area right before the core is maintained.  As you are probably aware I reduced  my left radiator inlet duct from 24 in^2 to 10 in^2 for a total radiator inlet area (both inlets)  reduction of 33%.  My coolant temp did increase by 5 F but I am convinced that duct is much more efficient at flowing air than before and generates less drag.  Now when I do both ducts, I will probably set the inlet area around 15 in^2  rather than 10 in^2 to provide a little pad for those very hot days.  But whatever opening area you decide on, your airflow should benefit from the use of the streamline duct approach. 
 
Since the cores are not symmetrical, you will need to enter the width or height separately and generate a coordinate plot from each view.  I would lay the top and side coordinates out on cardboard first and then transfer them to a block of foam and use them to shape the foam to the streamline duct shape.  Then fiberglass over that would give you your duct. 
 
I have attached some photos and my streamline duct coordinator generator if you are interested.   While ideally your coordinate system should be based on the ratio between your inlet area and core area - any ratio that gives you close to your desired inlet and core area should be a large improvement.  So what I'm saying not to get hung up on exact match - close enough will provide considerable benefit if not perfection.
 
As I have stated, with sufficient air mass flow and surface area you will cool!  However, unless you optimize to the extend possible, you may also incur considerable cooling drag.
 
I know you have a lot to get done and may decided to put this off until the  next revision, but thought I would throw it out at this time  - so I wouldn't hear later "Why didn't Ed tell me?"  {{:>)
 
Best Regards
 
Ed
 
Ed Anderson
RV-6A N494BW Rotary Powered
Matthews, NC
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster