X-Junk-Score: 0 [] X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 [] X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=G+5i7Os5 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=0WrWrDzmOGG0pDJVai42kw==:117 a=v6Bp6ei8bAt+wpkztvcClw==:17 a=jpOVt7BSZ2e4Z31A5e1TngXxSK0=:19 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=x7bEGLp0ZPQA:10 a=A-0mRrAPPO4A:10 a=J70Eh1EUuV4A:10 a=o1OHuDzbAAAA:8 a=_6GpL_ENAAAA:8 a=rACVaYa6B99JXhI4rMUA:9 a=7GDLVza1b-oCCPry:21 a=058Cm9wPK2tNjixj:21 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=5YQ6H4ZxyGn-KoBYtt8s:22 From: "Charlie England ceengland7@gmail.com" Received: from mail-yb1-f176.google.com ([209.85.219.176] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.2.14) with ESMTPS id 12951851 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 17:27:04 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.219.176; envelope-from=ceengland7@gmail.com Received: by mail-yb1-f176.google.com with SMTP id u32so9217509ybi.12 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 14:27:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=c9wgP7DNC6OZNLokxZQIL1dWtubeHMjIAWtl76Egcks=; b=JBG3P84kxpRKvLgd7UoBZppClls6XcxkaLs3p5QKRYVCOxJ3aRbrTsHDrG2aYBE03v G53Q6cFr01ioRJyo9bDrwgLjUNcz2ikvM5zQ423UXNaiW17xlOhDBX9d3hlhAiOZhkkU z3i+M42TedpmMBMAw+scKIa9y9mBDOb8chugcUIjP9+8hT6MuNBTpId3oCUW23KdhS0c hx3/ZHWKrIACwWPo0ycltuZ1cMEDPZdiRocRTga2DE++Hp7GMDKctNuUTOQ3w35JWCv1 W/A0vW9zxpniu8HJXQKtGiy/fVTk+kRcMBVOeleWQCzVpxAry0KC2Z0UbZoCJ/Tf66VI THPg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=c9wgP7DNC6OZNLokxZQIL1dWtubeHMjIAWtl76Egcks=; b=BEgamLwS/Q+0ErR1/4ViT3eDIJMje6YzXdzeOlmix1UvR/Ho1LCOaF3FhJ6ZTRE+2d u8QemQbR7JBAksTsfRvoejXohqkkqThYfUOQTUjvVzIhCOTaK/t2uHd8flwQh82DInFr 1bxv4y0p9ivjSrGBslejFhyRRbKqugrct0dc7w3drBQ9FdBt1L1rurGutW3s8E1sojd7 hQWbgcy67gmb6R7anMQRhPN8sjH2HSuqn4Gr3VnoMgawpykRCLdYh9f7wNnIFm7iiCfL EdwO9kq54Whj3dTk3CecPC1lZpyEd0+krVWEzldG5ciMjfYAyResVZuhW7g0SovxV+Jf QTlA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWS6UTiFfCQqusirbBmF7wN8ALVa7aQZtKo2H9wzRivmyqRc8pc JjW754vmdCg9d1R0cgVX6ibooUk/ X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxbE00X0vCXD5QDMs1fqyLUIx/X8ztFBDBObZjw1Ke9gwXoijD2M0fEUTzZfqDXW6t+MLdFOA== X-Received: by 2002:a5b:4f:: with SMTP id e15mr3299825ybp.519.1568323607397; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 14:26:47 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from [192.168.10.217] (mobile-166-172-58-245.mycingular.net. [166.172.58.245]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id t12sm5333784ywf.43.2019.09.12.14.26.45 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 12 Sep 2019 14:26:46 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Intake progress To: Rotary motors in aircraft References: Message-ID: Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 16:26:47 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 190912-6, 09/12/2019), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Like most people's dad used to say, "Don't do as I do (did); do as I say." :-) Tracy looked at my box after it was built & pointed out what I should have considered: those big flat (thin) aluminum panels won't survive intake pressure waves. I knew better, but that part of my mind had gone on break during the entire construction of the box. Car makers don't waste aluminum making cast 1/4" thick plenums just to get rid of surplus aluminum. :-) That box is now lined with 1/4" plywood and fiberglass, and weighs far too much. I'm doubtful that it will be a flight item. I'd suggest doing what Tracy did, & start with plywood/fiberglass, or use a 4"-6" round aluminum tube for the plenum. I can probably dig up some 6" if you want to try it, or check local farm-market publications down there for surplus irrigation pipe. I never did find any tube length/plenum sizing advice for the rotary that I trusted. Very few Renesis car guys ever touch the stock manifold, since it would be very difficult to improve on Mazda's design for a car. Charlie On 9/12/2019 12:02 PM, Finn Lassen finn.lassen@verizon.net wrote: > 6 1/2 years later I'm about to do the same and would like to ask the > same question before I make my "shoe box": > > "I'm curious about how others have adapted the common Helmholtz intake > tuning formulas to the rotary. Would anyone care to 'show their (math) > work'?" > > Rather than building it as big as possible, I'd like to know if there > is an optimal size. > > Finn > > Charlie's photo: > > > > On 2/17/2013 3:41 PM, Charlie England wrote: >> >> Now that everyone's awake again, I thought I'd send a pic of my >> intake progress (RV-7 Renesis with James Lyc cowl). I played with a >> couple of different materials for the bell mouths. I tried gluing up >> some 1/4" plexi from an old windshield, but used super glue instead >> of proper plexi cement (which I wasn't able to find locally in a >> hurry). The 1st try popped apart on the lathe; the 2nd turned out ok. >> Next effort was with 3/4" MDF (medium density fiberboard). That went >> well, until I put a little too much side pressure on the ring >> (homemade cutting tool) after undercutting the center section. >> Overall tube lengths will be ~11 3/4" block surface to bell ends. The >> plenum is *much* bigger than most tuning sites recommend. I figure >> that I can experiment with plenum size by just stuffing it with rigid >> foam to take up some volume, if needed. Going the other way wouldn't >> be so easy. :-) >> >> Since I don't have Mark's TIG skills, I thought I'd ask what others >> have used in joining thin wall tubing to 1/4" aluminum plate. >> Aluminum brazing rod? High temp epoxy? JB weld? I do intend to add >> bracing from the plate to the plenum assembly to take some of the >> cantilever & vibration stress off the tubes. >> >> I'm using this length and concept because Tracy has had great luck >> with both HP & BSFC on his Renesis with a similar configuration. >> However, I'm curious about how others have adapted the common >> Helmholtz intake tuning formulas to the rotary. Would anyone care to >> 'show their (math) work'? Renesis users would be better for me, but >> any calcs would do. When I tried to adapt the common formulas to a >> rotary, I was getting 'interesting' results, so I'd like to know if I >> got lost somewhere while trying to plug rotary 'valve' timing into >> the formulas. >> >> Charlie >> (Sorry for the sideways iphone pic; I guess you can pretend that >> you're looking down on it...) > > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus