X-Junk-Score: 0 [] X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 [] X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=PNVxBsiC c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=MXRAKZlQQgzJ5ErwEh8GJw==:117 a=7NrS+FD+rRqd7zzMrW2Xfg==:17 a=jpOVt7BSZ2e4Z31A5e1TngXxSK0=:19 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=x7bEGLp0ZPQA:10 a=CKeqCrOqW6IA:10 a=0o9FgrsRnhwA:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=Ia-xEzejAAAA:8 a=o1OHuDzbAAAA:8 a=lKPQtorlAAAA:8 a=MMMxZlE7AAAA:8 a=UKPAHat8AAAA:8 a=s1I-Y6CqAAAA:8 a=3oc9M9_CAAAA:8 a=7g1VtSJxAAAA:8 a=MroaLg5TKnfEGzqbTN8A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=Qa1je4BO31QA:10 a=TbTuEfNj71wA:10 a=gvSQh4r-fQ0A:10 a=Urk15JJjZg1Xo0ryW_k8:22 a=5YQ6H4ZxyGn-KoBYtt8s:22 a=opVyWQfbEivB9Nt9EY2k:22 a=c1TPop_4XmU7Vuhlasjn:22 a=Fc6xXSS-RxGHxrvp76Qp:22 a=1z8CZO-gz1oi-LRGHyP3:22 a=grOzbf7U_OpcSX4AJOnl:22 From: "Stephen Izett stephen.izett@gmail.com" Received: from mail-pl1-f173.google.com ([209.85.214.173] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.2.13) with ESMTPS id 12750815 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 20:05:19 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.214.173; envelope-from=stephen.izett@gmail.com Received: by mail-pl1-f173.google.com with SMTP id ay6so2020557plb.9 for ; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 17:05:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:references :to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=4OSpuBdsqqaLAifdRj3Q8exwtyk/TqZkrI38EwfH4pA=; b=jfC4C+zMYlm67nSDfeHOWm/MqDBnnDvmLcacLM4ORUVOjIWownBcGmo65VXj5BWScB bZ+wDYUe1l9PngtxiUWIZXBNXLrxuWqh4iCT3p3jDy3yuu6rM3p6nkxGBB3ej1qN7v7n bkxJ/vSmPuo50YPgvTRGArQ4/PIaebKQVVf7gEPVRRGlmdtvGWHcUuB/F4XPKp0gsxad cPsKnD17jVHb2Av5Ex1p4RDG1oqxAxBhBFr3T5xXwFZO6ApZsotMswYoWRT+zvFuxZoQ dKboNf4a4neKLJ/uizSVfGk2LF1jF348b4yL4FqukJ5B+o1Ng5dJKjHI92HehToC1+2e GKWg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to:message-id; bh=4OSpuBdsqqaLAifdRj3Q8exwtyk/TqZkrI38EwfH4pA=; b=SoHqr5iRWBqRBe2QtE+ub/QGAmkypd9F/GomxssiDM4fDtwvgJ7WQgT8tvJWBB/JIs Ct7h5/Ll5okX9Np1QttlvvPgSF2gAEpgXd0TD4KqVNrPXAb6lrFOZJdk8EVltqmP1aTM 74wEnwYAbQOkrmhJsK19ZExwFZnPJP/8aLtocv1pKi2CbX1ZGk4ReblATuSSjpewSoLG GtO9i+cbB3BimGSjIarhAWRqgcD/4LtIRmB+nVs1rRNwgxLF+s/wUaLjOxnw7THIFhk6 SQ752o2rqWyFwEViKPGFpfMb8hjns/lQY24QfhMo6mR0z6HtLPxSMputRmzrmWWxCK00 txzg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWaYBfsarn39RCQ6twyRC+MBFSIjukAtSva2L7fmuBcih1sVeMf abbtbJQ5MyAWrOwxCA232lvedQ5P X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw2vGMiEvruLqpEcwwOoeVWhUUByHtr4t6fgA3sQGPiz86imWJwFWGLptF0LItCZrspHdQ5Dg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d81:: with SMTP id 1mr1097143plv.323.1562803503410; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 17:05:03 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from steves-mbp.lan ([118.208.161.182]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q13sm3086273pgq.90.2019.07.10.17.05.01 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 10 Jul 2019 17:05:02 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\)) Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: timing on renesis engines Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 08:04:51 +0800 References: To: Rotary motors in aircraft In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <8CB7B596-D8E7-474A-954B-7B83D5ACBECE@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3) Thank Matt An adjustment during cranking (voltage) made sense, particularly for = lower energy coils. I didn=E2=80=99t realise that they adjusted dwell to RPM or MAP these = days.=20 So at say 14v bus the dwell is adjusted from 4.16mS at 0-4400RPM then = down to 3.36mS at 7600RPM. So I=E2=80=99m wondering if the dwell would be safer set at 3.5mS for = the sake of the higher RPM's I have cool air feeding the coils. Cheers Steve > On 10 Jul 2019, at 10:03 pm, Matt Boiteau mattboiteau@gmail.com = wrote: >=20 > I attached the GM dwell settings for LS2 truck coils. Depending on the = RPM & volts, it adjusts the dwell timing >=20 > Yes the coils get the bus volts. On most first gen ECUs, all you got = was one dwell setting to cover it all. Next generation added battery = correction, so at least you could give more timing during crank vs high = speed. Latest gen added RPM and MAP to adjust the dwell timing. Tracy's = ECU was light years ahead of the curve back in the 2000s. We are 20 = years later now and I would guess (don't quote me), you probably just = get one dwell timing to cover it all. >=20 > Are you going to notice any different, probably not.... Will your = coils burn out any sooner? probably not compared to flying hours vs how = many hours vehicles get. If you are concerned about coil life, change = them every xxx hours. >=20 > I'm running megasquirt, so they have RPM vs MAP with a general battery = correction applied. Also with the truck coils having heatsinks, perfect = place to add blast tubes. >=20 > - Matt Boiteau >> On 2019-07-10 4:31:14 AM, Stephen Izett stephen.izett@gmail.com = wrote: >>=20 >> Hi Fin=20 >>=20 >> The coil trigger will come direct from the processor outputs I = expect.=20 >> So your right, the coils will see whatever the bus is, whatever the = alternator is doing.=20 >>=20 >> Steve=20 >>=20 >> > On 9 Jul 2019, at 10:52 pm, Finn Lassen finn.lassen@verizon.net = wrote:=20 >> >=20 >> > Disregard. Those drivers are most likely for the injectors. Don't = have the EC3 schematic so no clue what drives the coils.=20 >> >=20 >> > Finn=20 >> >=20 >> > On 7/9/2019 10:35 AM, Finn Lassen finn.lassen@verizon.net wrote:=20 >> >> All EC3 drivers are IRL530NS power MOSFETs with a on-resistance of = 0.1 ohms.=20 >> >>=20 >> >> So the voltage the coils see will pretty much be whatever your 12 = volt bus is -- whatever the alternator outputs.=20 >> >>=20 >> >> Haven't looked at the program code but suspect that coil sees full = voltage during the dwell time -- simple on/off.=20 >> >>=20 >> >> Finn=20 >> >>=20 >> >> On 7/8/2019 9:24 PM, Matt Boiteau mattboiteau@gmail.com wrote:=20 >> >>> Depends what voltage it's??nominal at.=20 >> >>> Look at the Miata link, it shows actual GM dwell settings from = their ECU.=20 >> >>>=20 >> >>> You'll see RPM vs voltage for the dwell settings. I don't know = how Tracy's computer handles the dwell.=20 >> >>>=20 >> >>> - Matt Boiteau=20 >> >>>> On 2019-07-08 7:17:34 PM, Stephen Izett stephen.izett@gmail.com = wrote:=20 >> >>>>=20 >> >>>> So which MS document do we take as being the good oil for the = LS2 coils. Is it 4.0mS or 3.5mS ?=20 >> >>>>=20 >> >>>> Steve Izett=20 >> >>>>=20 >> >>>> > On 9 Jul 2019, at 6:04 am, Matt Boiteau mattboiteau@gmail.com = wrote:=20 >> >>>> >=20 >> >>>> > That's an outdated page. I'm not sure why they even keep them = alive.=20 >> >>>> > http://www.msextra.com/doc/pdf/MS3baseV30_Hardware-1.4.pdf=20 >> >>>> > Page 93=20 >> >>>> >=20 >> >>>> > Of course that number depends what voltage is consider at = "nominal". Not sure if Tracy's changes value based on voltage or not. = And RPM vs Manifold pressure=20 >> >>>> >=20 >> >>>> > = https://www.miataturbo.net/diy-turbo-discussion-14/lsx-coil-thread-82744/p= age8/#post1380088=20 >> >>>> >=20 >> >>>> >=20 >> >>>> >=20 >> >>>> > - Matt Boiteau=20 >> >>>> >> On 2019-07-08 11:58:11 AM, Bobby J. Hughes bhughes@qnsi.net = wrote:=20 >> >>>> >>=20 >> >>>> >> Matt,=20 >> >>>> >>=20 >> >>>> >>=20 >> >>>> >>=20 >> >>>> >> How did you end up with 3.5ms for the D585???s? At least one = Megasquirt resource shows 4.0ms at 14VDC. My concern is the wide range = between Tracy???s LS1 4.3ms and the 3.5ms referenced. If the megasqiurt = information is correct then Tracy was very conservative with the LS1 = settings. 4.0ms vs 5.6ms.=20 >> >>>> >>=20 >> >>>> >>=20 >> >>>> >>=20 >> >>>> >>=20 >> >>>> >>=20 >> >>>> >> http://www.megamanual.com/seq/coils.htm=20 >> >>>> >>=20 >> >>>> >>=20 >> >>>> >>=20 >> >>>> >> Bobby=20 >> >>>> >>=20 >> >>>> >>=20 >> >>>> >>=20 >> >>>> >> From: Rotary motors in aircraft = [mailto:flyrotary@lancaironline.net]=20 >> >>>> >> Sent: Friday, July 05, 2019 8:03 PM=20 >> >>>> >> To: Rotary motors in aircraft=20 >> >>>> >> Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: timing on renesis engines=20 >> >>>> >>=20 >> >>>> >>=20 >> >>>> >>=20 >> >>>> >> For the LS2 - D585 truck coils, 3.5ms is the recommended = dwell.=20 >> >>>> >>=20 >> >>>> >>=20 >> >>>> >>=20 >> >>>> >>=20 >> >>>> >> - Matt Boiteau=20 >> >>>> >>=20 >> >>>> >> On 2019-07-05 7:37:10 PM, Stephen Izett = stephen.izett@gmail.com wrote:=20 >> >>>> >>=20 >> >>>> >> Thanks Bobby and Lyn.=20 >> >>>> >>=20 >> >>>> >> According to Tracy???s code - 2.6 mSec RX8, 3.5 mSec RX7, 4.0 = mSec LS2, 4.3 mSec LS1.=20 >> >>>> >> I also wondered about the timing difference between the = various coils trigger circuit actually firing.=20 >> >>>> >> Now I suppose that difference might be a few uSec and = insignificant, but if its 100uSec=20 >> >>>> >> then the timing difference between various coil types might = become significant.=20 >> >>>> >>=20 >> >>>> >> @ 7000 RPM=20 >> >>>> >> 1 rev takes 8.6mSec=20 >> >>>> >> So each degree of EShaft rotation is 24uSec.=20 >> >>>> >>=20 >> >>>> >> Thanks again for the help.=20 >> >>>> >>=20 >> >>>> >> Steve=20 >> >>>> >>=20 >> >>>> >>=20 >> >>>> >>=20 >> >>>> >>=20 >> >>>> >>=20 >> >>>> >>=20 >> >>>> >>=20 >> >>>> >> > On 6 Jul 2019, at 2:52 am, Bobby J. Hughes bhughes@qnsi.net = wrote:=20 >> >>>> >> >=20 >> >>>> >> > Lynn,=20 >> >>>> >> >=20 >> >>>> >> > Default is what ever Tracy set it to. The CAS location is = not adjustable so default is set in his code.=20 >> >>>> >> >=20 >> >>>> >> > Bobby=20 >> >>>> >> >=20 >> >>>> >> > Sent from my iPhone=20 >> >>>> >> >=20 >> >>>> >> > On Jul 5, 2019, at 12:43 PM, lehanover lehanover@aol.com = wrote:=20 >> >>>> >> >=20 >> >>>> >> >> What is the "Default" advance? Is that checked with a = timing light? Easy starting can be up to 15 degrees of advance. For full = power use up to 27 degrees of advance is good up to 10,500 RPM. Boosted = engines require less advance as boost increases. Because the effective = compression ratio as well as charge temperature is going up. Very high = boost my have advance closer to zero. Advance is used to allow full = combustion=20 >> >>>> >> >> of the charge before the exhaust port opens. At higher = pressure and temps the flame front speeds are increasing. So, less time = is needed. Thus less advance is needed. Lowering intake air temps with = an inter-cooler and adding water spray can allow higher boost.=20 >> >>>> >> >>=20 >> >>>> >> >> Boosting to maintain sea level performance would probably = not shorten engine life. Boosting for additional performance does = shorten engine life. The kids get over 600 HP with boosted drag racing = engines. This is fine if you only need the engine for 9 seconds. You = have to know what the actual advance is to make any decision. Mark the = flex plate or flywheel teeth with paint so you can check actual advance = during any RPM.=20 >> >>>> >> >>=20 >> >>>> >> >>=20 >> >>>> >> >> It is difficult to detonate an NA engine. It is not = difficult detonate a boosted engine.=20 >> >>>> >> >>=20 >> >>>> >> >> Lynn E. Hanover=20 >> >>>> >> >>=20 >> >>>> >> >>=20 >> >>>> >> >> In a message dated 7/5/2019 10:22:44 AM Eastern Standard = Time, flyrotary@lancaironline.net writes:=20 >> >>>> >> >>=20 >> >>>> >> >> Steve,=20 >> >>>> >> >> I???m running default timing or maybe 1 degree advanced. = Early on I experimented with 1-2 degrees advance for many flight hours = and did not detect any noticeable change in engine performance. I did = push the engine to what I believe was detonation during a ground tuning = session. I was tuning under boost (44??? MP) , 7000 rpm with a wideband = O2 on each runner and adjusting Mode 9 and Mode 4. With F/A balanced = between each rotor and EGT???s under 1600F I was trying to see if = increasing timing would lower EGT???s. F/A was in the 11???s. This was = at the end of the session and the engine and supercharger were already = hot. I think I had added 4-5 degrees advance with no noticeable EGT = decrease when I encountered a mild bang or misfire. This condition was = well above my 38??? MP limit I sometimes use for takeoff.=20 >> >>>> >> >>=20 >> >>>> >> >> I???m curious about the dwell time setting difference = between LS1 and LS2 coils. I switched to LS2 coils sometime back with no = failures to date. I remember seeing an option setting in some of the = code you or Finn posted. Internet research indicates LS2 coils require = less dwell time than LS1. Possibly 0.5-1 ms less.=20 >> >>>> >> >>=20 >> >>>> >> >> Bobby=20 >> >>>> >> >>=20 >> >>>> >> >> Sent from my iPad=20 >> >>>> >> >>=20 >> >>>> >> >> > On Jul 5, 2019, at 12:58 AM, Stephen Izett = stephen.izett@gmail.com wrote:=20 >> >>>> >> >> >=20 >> >>>> >> >> > Hi there Guys=20 >> >>>> >> >> >=20 >> >>>> >> >> > Of the guys with Renesis engines using EC2/3 can you = comment on your timing settings.=20 >> >>>> >> >> > I???ve to date left the timing at the default setting = figuring its set by the location of the CAS.=20 >> >>>> >> >> > Not sure if the various coil options have different = trigger timing latency.=20 >> >>>> >> >> >=20 >> >>>> >> >> > Thanks=20 >> >>>> >> >> >=20 >> >>>> >> >> > Steve Izett=20 >> >>>> >> >> >=20 >> >>>> >> >> >=20 >> >>>> >> >> >=20 >> >>>> >> >> >=20 >> >>>> >> >> > --=20 >> >>>> >> >> > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/=20 >> >>>> >> >> > Archive and UnSub: = http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html=20 >> >>>> >> >>=20 >> >>>> >> >> --=20 >> >>>> >> >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/=20 >> >>>> >> >> Archive and UnSub: = http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html=20 >> >>>> >>=20 >> >>>> >>=20 >> >>>> >> --=20 >> >>>> >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/=20 >> >>>> >> Archive and UnSub: = http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html=20 >> >>>> >>=20 >> >>>> >>=20 >> >>>>=20 >> >>>>=20 >> >>>> --=20 >> >>>> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/=20 >> >>>> Archive and UnSub: = http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html=20 >> >>=20 >> >>=20 >> >=20 >> >=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> --=20 >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/=20 >> Archive and UnSub: = http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html=20 > -- > Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ > Archive and UnSub: = http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/flyrotary/List.html